Get the most updated and recent current affair content on Padhaikaro.com
Introduction
Can living in a safe environment be part of our human rights?
People are facing a threat we’ve never faced before: environmental disasters. This article will enlighten you how the law is adapting to keep the world itself safe, by protecting our environment.
Does nature have any legal rights? How can laws developed for humans are adapted to protect nature?
The environment is being threatened like never before. Human activity is changing the world around us, warming the air and sea. Extreme floods, droughts and wildfires are increasingly common and affect all continents and oceans.
How the law help?
Laws are basically an agreement between people. How can you have an agreement with something that’s not a person – a tree for example? We depend on the world around us: we need clean air, clean water and clean earth to live.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights says everyone has the right to life and security. We can’t have either life or security without a healthy environment. So, that’s where the law comes in.
Environmental laws started really being developed in the middle of the last century(1950s). With more and more countries agreeing treaties – international agreements – there is greater willingness to engage in conversations about how to prevent environmental disasters.
Some of the laws explained how keep the environment safe.
There are UN-sponsored international laws to deal with issues like climate change, Ozone layer depletion, protection of biological diversity, protection of international watercourses, protection of endangered species, and regulation on persistent organic pollutants.
There are also laws that are made by regional organisations, like the European Union targeting the European environment.
Many laws come from global organisations, others from regional bodies like the European Union. They cover a huge range of areas.
What kind of laws are they and what power do they have?
There are two main types of law: soft laws, which are more like political commitments or aims, and hard laws. You can be punished for breaking a hard law.
There are soft laws and there are hard laws. Soft laws are mere political commitments; they are not binding.
Hard laws are binding – say if a state ratifies a hard law and then does something that is against the letters and spirits of the law, then you can actually file a case against the state for violation of any particular Environmental Law.
In a article of Universal Declaration of Human Rights, where it says that states have to Endeavour to improve all aspects of industrial and environmental hygiene.
We do have two types of treaties:
They do not expressly talk about environmental rights, but protection of environment is linked to enjoyment of your civil, political, social and economic rights.
Similarly, the enjoyment of your social, political, economic and cultural rights also depend on your enjoyment of environmental rights.
So the big human rights laws don’t actually say very much about the environment. But many of your rights depend on it: without a safe environment, we couldn’t enjoy our rights
Are there any laws that give us a safe environment?
It was this year only, that in March 2021, 69 countries have agreed to work together to ensure that there is an international law that will recognise people’s right to help the environment. The major obstacles remain lack of political commitment.
Is that enough to help in the real world?
Climate change is harming people now. In 2018, more than 35,000 people were forced to flee their homes in the Mekong Delta every day.
The Mekong River is the agricultural heartland of Vietnam and home to 20% of the country’s population.
But the Mekong river doesn’t just flow through Vietnam. It starts in the Tibetan plateau, also going through China, Myanmar, Laos, Thailand and Cambodia. So, to prevent people in Vietnam fleeing their homes, we need an international agreement.
The Ganges in India: viewed as holy by millions of people, but it’s also much polluted.
To protect it, the river was, for 109 days, declared a legal person by a court in the state of Uttarakhand. It was given the same rights as a child: as it couldn’t speak for itself, a board was appointed to speak for it.
The Government eventually said this couldn’t go on, as the river went beyond the limits of Uttarakhand.
So, can the law protect the environment, as well as the people who are affected by it?